Common Employment Pass Mistakes Businesses Should Avoid During Application
- Koh Management
- 3 hours ago
- 5 min read
Applying for an Employment Pass (EP) in Singapore can unlock enormous opportunities for businesses — especially those expanding, hiring niche expertise, or building leadership capabilities. However, despite true business needs and strong candidate profiles, many companies still face delays, rejections, or multiple rounds of queries due to avoidable mistakes.
The Employment Pass framework is structured, transparent and fair, but it demands accuracy, strong justification, and compliance readiness. Businesses that understand the common pitfalls often secure faster approvals and avoid costly setbacks.
This article highlights the most frequent mistakes companies make during EP applications, why they cause rejection, and how businesses can avoid them to improve their approval success rate significantly.
Mistake 1 — Submitting Incomplete or Unclear Documentation
One of the most common reasons EP applications fail is missing or poorly prepared documents. MOM expects clarity, consistency and complete information before granting approval.
Common documentation problems include:
Missing educational certificates or transcripts
Titles in job description not matching employment contract
Incomplete ACRA and business financial details
Unclear or unverified work experience
Low-resolution or inaccurate document copies
An EP application is only as strong as the evidence provided. Every supporting file must be accurate, properly formatted and clearly readable.
Mistake 2 — Vague Job Descriptions With Generic Duties
A poorly detailed job scope is one of the biggest red flags. MOM must clearly understand the applicant’s responsibilities and why foreign expertise is needed.
Mistakes often seen:
Weak Example | Strong Example |
“Handle operations and admin work” | “Oversee logistics automation using AI-powered demand forecasting tools” |
“Assist with marketing tasks” | “Execute SEO and paid ad campaigns for US & ASEAN markets with expected 40% revenue growth within 18 months” |
The more generic the role, the less likely an EP will be granted. Specificity equals justification — and justification equals approval.
Mistake 3 — Salary Not Matching Experience or Seniority
Even if a candidate meets qualifications, undervalued salary packages will weaken the EP case. MOM compares salaries against the industry and seniority to gauge skill level.
Offering too low a salary may signal that:
The candidate is not truly specialised
A local candidate could fill the same role
The business is uncertain about sustainability
Businesses should benchmark salary realistically based on skill scarcity, role complexity and market wage indicators.
Mistake 4 — Weak Business Justification for Hiring a Foreigner
Many companies assume that qualification alone is enough, but MOM evaluates necessity, not convenience.
Weak justifications often include:
“No locals applied” — passive reasoning lacks credibility
“We prefer foreign knowledge” — preference is not justification
“Company is expanding” — expansion must be backed by plans
A strong justification includes:
Why the experience is unique and business-critical
How the candidate accelerates growth or innovation
Proof of expansion, contracts or market entry activities
EP approvals reward logic, not assumptions.
Mistake 5 — Not Preparing Business Financial Proof
Companies must show financial capability before a foreign hire is approved. Many startups and SMEs are rejected because they fail to provide:
Revenue proof
Paid-up capital documentation
Cashflow reserves
Market traction or contract projects
MOM must see that the company is stable enough to support long-term employment compensation.
Mistake 6 — Relying on Too Many EP Holders Without Hiring Locals
The COMPASS evaluation system places weight on workforce balance. Companies overly dependent on foreign manpower may lose points on:
Workforce diversity
Local core development
Fair employment compliance
To offset this, companies should:
Hire Singapore citizens and PRs when possible
Offer internships or traineeships
Build a long-term local development pathway
Foreign talent should complement — not replace — the local ecosystem.
Mistake 7 — Submitting an EP Application Without Understanding COMPASS
COMPASS is the backbone of EP evaluation today. Businesses that ignore the scoring framework often get rejected even if the candidate is strong.
COMPASS evaluates:
Category | Impact |
Salary benchmark | Higher salaries earn more points |
Qualifications | Universities and achievement level matter |
Diversity | Balanced nationalities perform better |
Support for local employment | Critical for positive score |
Bonus points may apply when hiring in shortage industries or innovation sectors. Smart companies plan hiring strategies around COMPASS, not after rejection.
Mistake 8 — Weak or Untimely Appeal After Rejection
Many companies submit appeals without strengthening their application, which results in repeated rejection.
An ineffective appeal sounds like:
“We would like MOM to reconsider the application. We need this staff.”
A successful appeal must include new evidence, such as:
Improved salary or seniority level
Business expansion or contract awards not previously shown
Clearer breakdown of work responsibilities
Training commitments for local transfers of knowledge
Appeals must add value — not defend weaknesses.
Mistake 9 — Using Template-Based Job Descriptions or Contracts
Copy-pasted descriptions are easy for MOM to identify. When job scope looks generic or widely available locally, approval is unlikely.
Instead, companies should tailor documents to reflect:
The actual systems, markets and technology used
KPIs, expected outcomes, and deliverables
Unique expertise required to operate the role
Authenticity matters.
Mistake 10 — Delaying MOM Queries or Responding Incompletely
If MOM requests further clarification, businesses must respond quickly and precisely. Slow replies indicate uncertainty and may weaken the application.
When responding to queries:
Provide supporting files, not assumptions
Explain changes clearly and professionally
Avoid emotional justification — use business logic
Be concise, factual and structured
Query management is often where approvals are won or lost.
Mistake 11 — Assuming EP Approvals Are Granted Automatically
Some employers assume that hiring professional-level talent guarantees approval — but this is no longer the case. The EP process is competitive and requires preparation.
Passing is not based on:
✘ Nationality preference✘ Company size alone✘ Candidate experience without proof✘ Simple job matching
Passing depends on:
✔ Evidence-backed justification✔ COMPASS scoring✔ Strong salary positioning✔ Financial and operational stability
Preparation is more valuable than expectation.
How Businesses Can Avoid EP Mistakes and Secure Success
To increase approval success, companies should proactively structure applications using the following checklist:
Approval Checklist | Results |
Detailed job description | Increases clarity & role necessity |
Competitive salary | Signals workforce value |
Clear business financials | Shows sustainability |
Candidate-linked justification | Strengthens approval logic |
COMPASS optimisation | Reduces rejection risk |
Locals hiring or training plan | Improves evaluation score |
Strong supporting evidence | Speeds up decision process |
When companies combine compliance readiness with strategic planning, approvals rise significantly.
Final Thoughts — Strong Applications Avoid Mistakes, Weak Ones Repeat Them
The Employment Pass process is not designed to make hiring difficult — it is designed to ensure fair, balanced and high-value workforce development in Singapore. Businesses that avoid common mistakes save time, reduce rejection risk, and secure foreign talent more efficiently.
Clarity wins. Planning wins. Evidence wins.
If your company is preparing an EP submission or needs expert assistance in avoiding mistakes, strengthening justification or managing appeals, you may visit https://employmentpassapplication.sg/ for end-to-end support.
